Re: Emblems Proposal

[Francesco Marletta <francesco marletta tiscali it>]

il 15 Jun 2003 10:49:38 +0200
Luca Ferretti <elle uca libero it> ha scritto:

> Il dom, 2003-06-15 alle 00:50, Francesco Marletta ha scritto:
> > il 14 Jun 2003 20:49:19 +0100
> > Mark Finlay <sisob eircom net> ha scritto:
> > 
> >  - i think that the "draft" icon is not clear (when I see that icon
> >  i
> > don't understand what it mean)
> > 
> 
> well, any idea to build up a draft emblem WITHOUT use draft label
> inside? and New too?

I'll think on it

> >  - for generic files, the second one is better (the first let me
> >  think
> > that there are text files, due to the "row" in the icon)
> > 
> 
> good point.
> 
> >  - for "International" (good idea) i think that the ONU flag woul be
> > better (for a lot of reasons)
> > 
> 
> mmhh It's copyrighted/patented/other... ?

I think no, but I'll investigate (by the way: the other flags are maybe
copyrighted/patented/other ?)

> 
> 
> >  - for "manual" I think that an icon showing a book would be better
> >  than
> > the yelp or the "?" icons
> > 
> 
> attached one is used in xd2 for Dictionary app, it need to be
> recolored.

do you refer to the gdict.png image? If the answer is yes then let me
say that I'm yet trying to understand what it represent

> 
> >  - the current "package" icon is much better the the proposed new
> >  one
> > 
> 
> But the current one uses wrong prospective, if we want follow HIG.
> Besides, yes, the current one has a better "icon concept"

so what's the problem? take the best from both: use a correct
prospective on the current icon

> 
> 
> >  - computer: the second is better
> > 
> 
> 
> I'm building something inspired to attached network icon

why the attach to the network?

Francesco