On 1 August 2017 at 16:47, Robert Ancell <robert ancell gmail com> wrote:
> Oh, it's actually the value of the bitfield? I was trying to work out what
> use the bitfield had... That makes sense now as I remember you saying if
> snapd said what fields it matched on it would help us sort better.
All working now? Anything more I can explain? Great to see you at GUADEC btw.