Hey, yeah, the extension JS isn't easy to read for me, I'm missing the JS documentation :/ But a general, application-independet, simple search provider is what I think of. The language isn't that relevant, but I would prefer Python. Thanks & Greetings, Christoph Am Freitag, den 04.12.2015, 19:52 +0100 schrieb Clemens:
sry, didn't know that. it's just the simplest provider i know and i thought it's easier for a python programmer to read js :) Am 2015-12-04 um 19:50 schrieb Florian Müllner:On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Clemens <clemens lab21 org> wrote:a very simple search provider extension is the Remmina search provider. It just looks in a ~/.remmina files and shows the result in overview.Please do not recommend implementing search providers as extensions, in particular not for results that are strongly tied to a specific application - it is always better in that case to let the application itself provide the results (integration with Settings, no blocking of the compositor, ...)
-- Visit me: http://joinout.de http://criztovyl.joinout.de https://github.com/criztovyl
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part