hi;
because extensions run in the same process space as the window
On 22 April 2014 14:40, alex diavatis <alexis diavatis gmail com> wrote:
> The question here is why GNOME Devs should explicitly review the extensions?
manager, which is a privileged piece of software.
this is not a matter of quality: it's a matter of shipping an
> Add a notice that we aren't responsible for the quality of extensions
extension from a gnome.org website that can do whatever it wants with
the input and output of your system.
this is even worse than not having anybody reviewing them.
> and let users review them.
it's not possible, unless you can write tools that manage to
> If possible have just some automated tests.
understand the intent of the code.
ciao,
Emmanuele.
--
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Sam Bull <sam hacking sent com> wrote:
>>
>> On mar, 2014-04-22 at 08:51 -0400, Norman L. Smith wrote:
>> > My entry in the queue is recent (less than two weeks ago, there is no
>> > personal complaint). I understand extensions are adjuncts to the shell
>> > and other priorities will always come before them.
>>
>> From what I can tell, it seems that there is only one person reviewing
>> extensions. This results in the queue only being reviewed like every 2
>> months or something, which causes long delays (I'm just an extension dev
>> myself). I'm guessing there's just nobody else volunteering to help with
>> reviews.
>>
>> Maybe if some kind of public call was put out, it might be possible to
>> find more some more reviewers, in order to improve this experience.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnome-shell-list mailing list
>> gnome-shell-list gnome org
>> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-shell-list mailing list
> gnome-shell-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
>
W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.name
B: http://blogs.gnome.org/ebassi/