Re: Design choice for suspend option only
- From: Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam whitemice org>
- To: gnome-shell-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Design choice for suspend option only
- Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 08:19:32 -0500
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 13:01 +0000, Mark Blakeney wrote:
> Can somebody please post a reference to a discussion amongst the gnome3
> developers about why they decided to only provide a suspend option on the
> user menu (and hide the power off option with the alt modifier)? I would
> really like to know by what rationale they came to this astonishing
> decision?
Oh crap, not this again. This has been discussed over and over and over
and over, and, yes, over again. I promise you nobody here is interested
in hearing about this *AGAIN*. The horse is dead, and covered with post
mortum bruising. Please don't kick it anymore.
I have no idea where the 'reference discussion' is. Search the
archives, you'll find tons of crap about this.
> I like and promote gnome-shell but frankly it is embarrassing to have to
> apologise for this design choice to new users. It leaves an awkward first
> impression.
So enable the extension that changes the behavior, then be happy.
<https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/5/alternative-status-menu/>
--
System & Network Administrator [ LPI & NCLA ]
<http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com>
OpenGroupware Developer <http://www.opengroupware.us>
Adam Tauno Williams
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]