Re: icons

[Alberto Ruiz <aruiz gnome org>]

Hello there,

I kind of agree here, those icons don't look very nice. Too light on
the top and too dark on the bottom, they don't blend well with, for
example the next/prev arrows. Those have a lower contrast and thinner
borders plus they don't look as bumpy.

They could use some love indeed.

Cheers,
Alberto

2011/3/12 Bob Hazard <linuxoflondon googlemail com>:
> On 10 March 2011 03:20, Robert Park <rbpark exolucere ca> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:12 PM,  <kaddy080 gmail com> wrote:
>>> But is there any plan to replace the ugly default gnome icons with a new
>>> fresh set of icons
>>> by final release of gnome 3?
>>
>> Just out of curiosity, but which icons are the 'ugly' default ones? I
>> hope you're not calling Tango ugly...
>
>
> The default zoom-in/zoom-out icons in gnome always look really bad to
> me. I understand the difficulty in not wanting to look like the Find
> icon or Add/Remove but they catch my eye as if they were from a
> different set
>
> http://www.gnome.org/img/flash/gnome3-teaser.png
>
>
> I'm a big fan of the Tango philosophy though, especially at 16x16
> where the well defined edges are great, such as in the nautilus places
> bar.
>
> --
> Sent from my Amiga
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-shell-list mailing list
> gnome-shell-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
>