Re: RFC: Tweaking tool for GNOME3
- From: Allan Day <allanpday gmail com>
- To: Johannes Schmid <jhs jsschmid de>
- Cc: gnome-shell-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: RFC: Tweaking tool for GNOME3
- Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 09:56:10 +0000
Johannes Schmid wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > https://github.com/nzjrs/gnome-tweak-tool
> >
> > It requires a recent pygobject build has been tested on a jhbuilt shell,
> > and Ubuntu Natty.
> >
> > I understand there is legitimate resistance to such a tool, as offering
> > multiple customisation options could weaken the design and marketing
> > message of the new shell. This is why I have not blogged nor posted this
> > widely. On the other hand, such tools will inevitably appear to fill the
> > power user niche so why not make the best of. I encourage the shell
> > developers to take it as a compliment when people express interest in
> > tweaking gnome-shell; it means they are using it and have not
> > reflexively stayed with GNOME2 or moved elsewhere.
> >
> > So I am asking for feedback, both strategic and functional on the tool.
> > It has a limited set of tweaks so far, but adding new ones is
> > straightforward (see tweaks/tweak_*.py).
>
> There is an "official" effort for writing such a tool so please contact
> desktop-devel-list
It has been discussed in the past, but nothing was ever done about it.
The "official" line (though quite what that means in GNOME is anyone's
guess ;) ) is that GNOME Shell / GNOME 3 is awesome as is. If John (or
anyone else) wants to write a tweak tool, than that is totally cool
though.
Thinking about this a little more, one danger of this tool is that
people immediately start using it with GNOME 3. I'd personally encourage
everyone to try the new desktop for a protracted period of time before
making any changes, however. It might take a little getting used to, but
there are good reasons for the design being the way it is, and it really
should offer a superior user experience to a customised version.
> because people will be highly interested and there will
> be not resistance. After all, this is nothing to ship by default but very
> useful to power-users.
>
> And technically, pygobject seems a good choice!
Yeah, great to see the new bindings in action! Nice work John.
Best wishes,
Allan
--
Blog: http://afaikblog.wordpress.com/
IRC: aday on irc.gnome.org
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]