Re: Overriding private functions from extensions

[Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds gmail com>]

On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Giovanni Campagna
<scampa giovanni gmail com> wrote:
> Not forbidden (they're just functions, we do nothing to protect them),
> just discouraged. It could be that the function was removed/renamed in
> 3.2 dev cycle, and so you need to port your extension to the new
> interface.

I'm writing a new extension and I'm sure the function is there
(looking glass confirms it), so it could be a problem somewhere in my
installation there.

> (In 3.3.2, actually the gjs class framework makes all class properties
> and functions non-configurable, so you cannot delete them, but it
> should still be possible to modify them)
-- 
Duy