Re: Food for thought - Unity usability test report
- From: Cosimo Cecchi <cosimoc gnome org>
- To: Aleksandra Bookwar <admin bookwar info>
- Cc: gnome-shell-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Food for thought - Unity usability test report
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:54:30 -0400
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 15:52 +0000, Aleksandra Bookwar wrote:
> This topic is called "Food for thought". So I've posted some info I
> collected about reaction on the Gnome Shell in Russian community. I don't
> demand anything like "real usability report status" here. (Though I was
> waiting for any kind of reaction at fedora-desktop@).
>
> Sorry, if I made this look pretentious for you. I will try not to interfere
> with this maillist anymore.
I don't think Adam wanted to make your opinion feel unwelcome or
unwanted here, but I am sure you realize there's a lot of difference in
methodology and scope between a scientific usability study and a
collection of feedback/pet missing features/bugs from an established
community.
I think both are useful in different ways, but they can't be called the
same thing at all.
Regards,
Cosimo
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]