Re: Finishing the mutter rename
- From: Tomas Frydrych <tf linux intel com>
- To: gnome-shell-list gnome org
- Cc: Thomas Thurman <tthurman gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Finishing the mutter rename
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 09:51:51 +0100
Owen Taylor wrote:
> Scenarios:
>
> Distro ships GNOME-2.28 and gnome-shell/mutter along side Metacity
>
> Embedded distribution includes Mutter
>
> Developer jhbuilds gnome-shell on GNOME-2.26
>
> User installs packages of gnome-shell/mutter on a GNOME-2.26 system
The scenario that I am concerned about is:
Distribution ships Mutter long before Gnome 2.28 without Metacity
Perhaps we can subsume it under the Embedded category.
> Data is moved from Metacity to gnome-wm-data, and renamed.
> (Keys changed to /apps/gnome-wm, themes are $theme/gnome-wm-1)
>
> Doing it this way avoids the confused dependency graph. It also is
> conceptually cleaner, since we don't have a non-metacity module
> calling stuff metacity.
>
> But, it requires a one-time key migration, and causes problems if
> installed along-side Metacity-2.26. (e.g., duplicated items in
> Keyboard Shortcuts)
This would be my preferred final solution. Could we perhaps do this in
two stages; first (now) migrate to the Metacity simple dependency, and
at a later stage, in coordination with Metacity, move toward the
renaming version of gnome-wm-data, so from the 2.28 release both
Metacity and Mutter would use the new keys ?
Tomas
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]