Re: [gnome-shell-ext] EXT :Re: Window Controls Extension
- From: "Boyce, Kevin P [US] (AS)" <Kevin Boyce ngc com>
- To: Florian Müllner <fmuellner gnome org>
- Cc: "gnome-shell-extensions-list gnome org" <gnome-shell-extensions-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [gnome-shell-ext] EXT :Re: Window Controls Extension
- Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 15:36:19 +0000
Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Florian Müllner <fmuellner gnome org>
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2019 11:33 AM
To: Boyce, Kevin P [US] (AS) <Kevin Boyce ngc com>
Cc: gnome-shell-extensions-list gnome org
Subject: Re: EXT :Re: [gnome-shell-ext] Window Controls Extension
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 4:45 PM Boyce, Kevin P [US] (AS) <Kevin Boyce ngc com> wrote:
Thanks for your reply. So my understanding is that in order to implement this behavior the source code for
mutter would need to be modified?
Yes, and GTK as well for consistency between server-side (mutter) and client-side (GTK, Qt, ...) decorations.
Is it reasonable to expect the mutter folks would accept a patch if I were to implement this behavior?
The behavior was rejected 17 years ago:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83892
(mutter is a fork of metacity, the default GNOME 2 window manager)
That is, providing a patch isn't enough, you'll also need very good reasoning for reverting that decision.
Cheers,
Florian
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]