Re: [Evolution] Palm Tungsten T - Sync
- From: JP Rosevear <jpr ximian com>
- To: gnome-pilot-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Palm Tungsten T - Sync
- Date: 21 Apr 2003 13:02:43 -0400
On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 13:48, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> JP Rosevear wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 12:51, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Frederic Crozat wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Le mar 15/04/2003 à 19:53, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Not implying my patch is perfect. For example, I lump together the
> >>product and vendor IDs, but it might be better to separate them, and
> >>maybe even use the same variable names as visor.h/visor.c so we can
> >>copy-and-paste to update one from the other (most likely updated
> >>gpilotd.c from visor.h/.c since one generally gets the kernel working
> >>with pilot-link before trying gnome-pilot).
> >>
> >>Any thoughts? Should I spend a bit of time to do this?
> >>
> >>
> >I don't think so, the vendor and product id's are all defines in visor.h
> >so there's no variables to copy.
> >
> Right, but there's the complete table of #defines in visor.c, which
> would cut-and-paste more easily than having to manually update a list in
> gpilotd.c. Then again, it doesn't seem at this point that the number of
> pilot devices will increase so fast that manual updates will be a
> problem. I'll leave it up to you, but let me know if you want me to try
> something like this.
>
> >I'm going to test the patch out this afternoon and tomorrow.
> >
> Thanks!
Ok, I tested it out and it seems fine, I've committed it with the
addition of a couple more devices.
-JP
--
JP Rosevear <jpr ximian com>
Ximian, Inc.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]