Re: [Evolution] Palm Tungsten T - Sync



On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 13:48, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> JP Rosevear wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 12:51, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>Frederic Crozat wrote:
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Le mar 15/04/2003 à 19:53, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>Not implying my patch is perfect.  For example, I lump together the 
> >>product and vendor IDs, but it might be better to separate them, and 
> >>maybe even use the same variable names as visor.h/visor.c so we can 
> >>copy-and-paste to update one from the other (most likely updated 
> >>gpilotd.c from visor.h/.c since one generally gets the kernel working 
> >>with pilot-link before trying gnome-pilot).
> >>
> >>Any thoughts?  Should I spend a bit of time to do this?
> >>    
> >>
> >I don't think so, the vendor and product id's are all defines in visor.h
> >so there's no variables to copy.
> >
> Right, but there's the complete table of #defines in visor.c, which 
> would cut-and-paste more easily than having to manually update a list in 
> gpilotd.c.  Then again, it doesn't seem at this point that the number of 
> pilot devices will increase so fast that manual updates will be a 
> problem.  I'll leave it up to you, but let me know if you want me to try 
> something like this.
> 
> >I'm going to test the patch out this afternoon and tomorrow.
> >
> Thanks!

Ok, I tested it out and it seems fine, I've committed it with the
addition of a couple more devices.

-JP
-- 
JP Rosevear <jpr ximian com>
Ximian, Inc.




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]