Re: 0.1.43 memo conduit



On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, Vadim Strizhevsky wrote:

> But what still buffles me, is why Charles had the problem in the first
> place. It just shouldn't be. Unless of course he used memo_file prior
> to 0.1.43 and didn't reenable it affresh, but it doesn't sound like
> that's the case.

I don't know. Charles ; did you delete the memos dir, or setup another
directory for memo_file ? If so, that might generate the problem.

Though ; How should a conduit like memo_file act when the user redefines
the directory ? Go into first_sync state ?

/dev/eskil
---




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]