Re: Gnome Pilot license
- From: Eskil Heyn Olsen <deity dbc dk>
- To: JP Rosevear <jpr cr168790-a nmkt1 on wave home com>
- cc: gnome-hackers gnome org, gnome pilot list <gnome-pilot-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Gnome Pilot license
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 13:11:56 +0100 (CET)
On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, JP Rosevear wrote:
> > gnome-pilot code. In general, no conduits except for GPL'ed may link with
> > gnome-pilot, that sort of sucks.
> Have the MALsync people been asked if they will GPL or LGPL their code
> yet?
I notified them of this some months ago, when they first approached me
reg. a gnome-pilot conduit. I got no reply then. I am now again trying to
get a hold of them.
But someday it might be something other then
Btw, is this moot, since gnome-libs is GPL'ed, having a xPL on gnome-pilot
would be "illegal", or is GPL/LGPL compatible (can they be ? Won't that
let people link non-GPL code with GPL'ed code via a LGPL layer ?)
license issues suck.
/dev/eskil
---
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]