Re: packages license
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- To: Gnome OS <gnome-os gnome org>
- Subject: Re: packages license
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 17:41:20 +1000
<quote who="Seth Nickell">
> > What as a distributor would we recommend the people installing. ie.
> > Would we install any "non-free" packages ?
> >
> > I'm thinking of java, the microsoft core fonts, and some other things
> > with dubious legal status (under US laws that is, like lame, freetype
> > with hinting, gif plugin for gimp, etc.).
>
> I'm willing to install non-free stuff, but I'd (obviously) prefer to
> restrict it to as little as possible.
Yeah, I agree. My system ends up being like that (acroread although it
sucks, Win4Lin, msttcorefonts, freetype, etc). No lame or gif though. :-)
Make OGGs, read MP3s... Sound fair? ;-)
> I'm happy to have a 90% free software product on 100 desktops rather than
> a 100% free software on 90 desktops.
Oh man, that's like Richard Stallman's most horrible nightmare statement.
- Jeff
--
He's not an idiot.
The doctor said so.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]