Re: The next Gnome Office release.
- From: Jody Goldberg <jody gnome org>
- To: Charles Goodwin <charlie xwt org>
- Cc: msevior physics unimelb edu au, "E. A. Zen" <ericzen ez-net com>, gnome-office-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: The next Gnome Office release.
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:20:20 -0500
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 09:18:55AM +0000, Charles Goodwin wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 14:12 +1000, Martin Sevior wrote:
> > Making a release is a significant amount of work. I think the whole
> > processes consumes at least 10-20 hours of development time. Building
> > binaries, updating websites, writing release notes, spamming the
> > internet is all work which I no longer find particularly fun.
>
> This whole process really should be automated.
In an ideal world maybe. In reality ... I doubt it.
Even if we ignore the stock auto* fighting the generated tarballs
need to be test built, trees tagged, and packages uploaded. This
is time consuming and is not well automated to date.
> Release notes could be construed as changelogs which should come from
> commit logs. Building binaries should be a one-press task to build for
> all platforms.
Release notes are still fairly manual. We need to summarize the key
elements.
While I agree that it would be nice to automate more of the process
things currently aren't even localized (abi in one place gnumeric in
another). Getting a person or team together to handle the grunt
work manually for now seems like the best approach toward getting
the automation built.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]