I like that, but we do have a problem: http://lists.gnome.org/archives/foundation-list/2004-January/msg00065.html Alan Cox: If the gnome foundation can't figure out usage rules soon I think its time to have a 'replacement foot' contest to replace what is effectively the foundations proprietary logo with an open one. On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 20:23, Luke Stroven wrote: > Don't know what the powers that be would like, but the topic icon I made > for use with GNOME Office stories on FootNotes is available here: > > Blown up in a wallpaper: > http://gnomedesktop.org/files/gnomeoffice.png > > SVG: > http://gnomedesktop.org/files/gnomeoffice.svg > > > Luke > > On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 13:56, Charles Goodwin wrote: > > Here's a thought on the logo for GO. > > > > If you look at the Gnome foot, it's a little like a G. And, if > > horizontally flipped, it'll look a little like an O. So, two feet, > > side-by-side or slightly offset (footsteps) will look like 'GO'. And > > you could optionally follow them with the rest of the text (ie -nome > > -ffice). > > > > Advantages to this approach would be: > > - identifiable with Gnome > > - a Gnome-associated metaphor (the second foot! footsteps!) > > - lots of foot-art already available > > - simple -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
