Re: [Conglomerate-devel] Re: Making Conglomerate part of Gnome Office
- From: Jody Goldberg <jody gnome org>
- To: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>
- Cc: Dave Malcolm <david davemalcolm demon co uk>, GNOME Office <gnome-office-list mail gnome org>, Conglomerate Development <conglomerate-devel lists copyleft no>
- Subject: Re: [Conglomerate-devel] Re: Making Conglomerate part of Gnome Office
- Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 00:13:03 -0400
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 07:13:13PM +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
>
> oh, yes, I forgot this in the status mail. As the files/objects/etc are
> namespaced for GOffice, iirc, it shouldn't be difficult. Or is there any
> other issue, like dependencies on the internal gnumeric code?
It is pulling in small parts of gnumeric code, but the intention is
to pull those down into goffice when it get split out. For example
a few widgets.
The plugin code will be trickier. We've learned a fair amount since
the gnome-office module code split out.
- requirements for management
(user/groups/system)
(per app vs per system)
- Ways of simplifying the types of services. GObject only seems
a bit too strict. Something like func, GObject, system, and
data seems necessary.
- handling stubs
- There is also an active debate on how to handle registry. Do
we continue using the discovery approach with light xml. Or
move to a gdk-pixbuf-query-loads approach
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]