On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 01:00:47AM +0000, Sander Vesik wrote: > Just for the record - I was talking about OO code. How Sun licences it's > code is up to Sun. I have no word in this. I just happen to like the > present setup. Nothing Sun could possibly do would affect how the code out > there is available. Yes, but I thought the meaning of your phrase was: why shouldn't (the contributors) dual license their code? If it's the original OO code, yes, I also agree Sun has the right to release it in whatever license it wants. > > Why can't "parts of this software" (that meaning what I wrote in GPL > > alone) "can only be distributed under the GPL"? After all, I CAN > > include the license in any code, and it's THAT code that is GPL. > No reason. It's yours. Do with it whatever you want. ok, so there is no need for AbiWord contributors to dual license, since their portions of code can be used in GPL alone? hugs, rms -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Ghandi + So let's do it...?
Attachment:
pgpBy6F8Ct445.pgp
Description: PGP signature