Re: GNOME Office and OpenOffice (fwd)

On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 11:54:15PM +0000, Sander Vesik wrote:
> Why should the code not be dual licenced?

Better yet, Why should it be dual licensed?

How exactly is GPL not enough, and how exactly would having my code in Dual License benefit me in ways that the GPL does not?

Why can't "parts of this software" (that meaning what I wrote in GPL alone) "can only be distributed under the GPL"? After all, I CAN include the license in any code, and it's THAT code that is GPL.

Please, be convincent.

+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Ghandi
+ So let's do it...?

Attachment: pgppfuXXUtFSU.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]