Re: Notes from Sound BoF at GUADEC 2008
- From: "Ronald S. Bultje" <rsbultje gmail com>
- To: "Lennart Poettering" <lennart poettering net>
- Cc: jensgr gmx net, Gnome Multimedia List <gnome-multimedia gnome org>, rodrigo gnome-db org, Tim Janik <timj gtk org>, mclasen redhat com, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>, vuntz gnome org
- Subject: Re: Notes from Sound BoF at GUADEC 2008
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:06:57 -0400
Hey Lennart,
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Lennart Poettering
<lennart poettering net> wrote:
> 1. write a new gnome-volume-control, directly linking against
> libpulse, that does all what pavucontrol does, however
> doesn't suck, isn't written in C++ and looks as pretty as
> the current g-v-c. (a compact version should be
> embeddable into the panel, a full version should run
> standalone. Also see Topaz mockups)
[..]
> 1. Check with people (i.e. Solaris, ...) if it is OK to
> link against libpulse directly from some very specific
> desktop applications (such as g-v-c) instead of always
> going through some kind of abstraction layer (i.e.
> GStreamer, libcanberra, ...).
> 2. Ask KDE folks about how to proceed with PA and lib
> canberra
How hard (compared to rewriting g-v-c/g-v-a to link to libpulse) is it
to abstract libpulse away in gst's mixer API, or to extend it to fit
libpulse's needs?
Ronald
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]