Re: [Totem] Browser plugin gstreamer

["Mark Trompell" <mark foresightlinux org>]

On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 14:17 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Mark Trompell <mark foresightlinux org> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net> wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 09:39 +0200, Mark Trompell wrote:
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>> I didn't have a deep look into the code yet, I just wonder how much a
>> >>> browser plugin needs to depend on totem.
>> >>> Would it make sense to have a more generic gstreamer browser plugin,
>> >>> so there is no need for all gstreamer applications to write their own?
>> >>
>> >> Which GStreamer applications would need to write their own browser
>> >> plugin? I'm counting none, which would make the point moot.
>> >
>> > That's the point, totem comes with a browser plugin to play embedded
>> > videofiles and stuff,
>> > but it pulls in a lot of totem. My point is why not have an
>> > application independent plugin.
>>
>> I developed an example plugin that uses GStreamer directly. I don't
>> think most of the stuff in totem is really required in a plugin, but
>> on the other side my plugin is not that complete either.
>>
>> Would it make sense to provide this code?
>
> Feel free. And when you've implemented versions to support all 4 most
> popular plugins, added playlist support, fullscreen, etc, let me know
> how much smaller your plugin is ;)

It might be still smaller than totem plugin + totem + nautilus + libgnome + ..
whatever totem pulls in as dependency.

-- 
Mark Trompell

Foresight Linux Xfce Edition
Cause your desktop should be freaking cool
(and Xfce)