Re: [Totem] Browser plugin gstreamer

On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Mark Trompell <mark foresightlinux org> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 09:39 +0200, Mark Trompell wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I didn't have a deep look into the code yet, I just wonder how much a
>>> browser plugin needs to depend on totem.
>>> Would it make sense to have a more generic gstreamer browser plugin,
>>> so there is no need for all gstreamer applications to write their own?
>> Which GStreamer applications would need to write their own browser
>> plugin? I'm counting none, which would make the point moot.
> That's the point, totem comes with a browser plugin to play embedded
> videofiles and stuff,
> but it pulls in a lot of totem. My point is why not have an
> application independent plugin.

I developed an example plugin that uses GStreamer directly. I don't
think most of the stuff in totem is really required in a plugin, but
on the other side my plugin is not that complete either.

Would it make sense to provide this code?

Felipe Contreras

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]