Re: gnome-cd

[Leonardo Pereira <leonardu_lopes yahoo com>]

--- "Ronald S. Bultje" <rbultje ronald bitfreak net>
wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 20:59, Leonardo Pereira wrote:
> > I was reading some past messages of this list and
> have
> > read that are some projects to purge gnome-cd of
> > gnome-media and put sound-juicer in its place. My
> > question is: Why sound-juicer? It has a ugly
> interface
> > and add a play button will not do it a good
> cd-player.
> > I think that we already have better options, like
> > goobox, that already is player and a ripper, it
> has a
> > beautiful interface.
> 
> I love flames.
I don't love flames, but, sometimes, we need to ask
for the best.

> 
> S-J is part of the GNOME desktop, so it surely can't
> be that bad.
"http://www.gnome.org/projects/"; doesn't have
Sound-Juicer, if you are talking about the fact that
Sound-Juicer uses libgnome, libglade and gstreamer,
Goobox and others cd-players do the same.

> Gnome-CD sucks, people agree on that. Even I, the
> gnome-cd maintainer, wholeheartedly admit that 
> gnome-cd is a violation of the human right for
> pretty software.
I agree that gnome-cd is sucks, but I don't agree that
sound-juicer isn't sux.
> 
> Next step is obvious. And so we did. If you prefer
> goobox, then use
> goobox. We don't want to limit you, we just want to
> eradicate ugly
> software, and gnome-cd definitely is ugly.
I am not saying that gnome-cd isn't ugly and that it
can not be removed from GNOME. But I want to see a
good program on its place, not another ugly software.
Did you have done any research about what people think
about Sound-Juicer and if they know another good
cd-player?

> 
> Ronald
> 
> -- 
> Ronald S. Bultje <rbultje ronald bitfreak net>
> 
> 

Leonardo Lopes Pereira


		
____________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Sports 
Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football 
http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com