Re: RedHat 7.1 + Ximian problems?



I'm using RedHat 7.1 and yes, I did have problems in getting the installer to complete. It eventually downloaded all of the packages but kept giving me an error about dependency conflict. An easy way to skip past the installer is to cd to /var/cache/redcarpet/packages  and install with rpm -Uvh *rpm
although this is too easy isn't it? well, the installer was right about complaining about deps, so I went ahead and used rpm -Uvh --force *rpm  and everything works fine.
 
 
 

Asher Freese wrote:

something safer to try would be "rpm -Uv gnome-core-(version).rpm"(and with any other packages in the list you want to try).
that will probably yield some of the errors the ximian installer saw, and you can figure out what needs to be done to fix them.
Asher

Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:

> No, you do NOT want to do this. If the rpms don't install normally then
> there is a problem. I would wait for someone who is more familiar with
> the package dependencies to respond - perhaps Ian Peters or one of the
> Ximian GNOME packagers.
>
> Jeff
>
> On 25 Apr 2001 19:28:21 +0200, Dragutin Cvetkovic (EEI) wrote:
> > Well u might wanna run smth like:
> >
> >       rpm -Uhv --force --nodeps *.rpm
> >
> > And then pray to god it will get up... then run redcarpet just so that it can then resolve these lacking dependencies and polish out ur system.
> >
> >       D.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Hauck [mailto:xdesign hotmail com]
> > Sent: 25 April 2001 18:14
> > To: Asher Freese; GNOME List
> > Subject: Re: RedHat 7.1 + Ximian problems?
> >
> >
> > Okay, I ran the upgrade manually ala "rpm --upgrade *.rpm" and here's the
> > results.
> >
> >
> > error: failed dependencies:
> >  libguile.so.6   is needed by libgtop-examples-1.0.10-3
> >  libgtop = 1.0.10 is needed by libgtop-examples-1.0.10-3
> > warning: LOOP:
> > warning: removing nautilus-trilobite-1.0.1.1-ximian.12 "Requires: nautilus =
> > 1.0.1.1" from tsort relations.
> > warning:     nautilus-trilobite-1.0.1.1-ximian.12     Requires: nautilus =
> > 1.0.1.1
> > warning: removing nautilus-1.0.1.1-ximian.12 "Requires: libtrilobite.so.0"
> > from tsort relations.
> > warning:     nautilus-1.0.1.1-ximian.12               Requires:
> > libtrilobite.so.0
> >
> >
> > Is that helpful to anyone?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Asher Freese <afreese umr edu>
> > To: GNOME List <gnome-list gnome org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 10:11 AM
> > Subject: Re: RedHat 7.1 + Ximian problems?
> >
> >
> > > First of all, to fix the ximian install, you could try installing a few of
> > the
> > > rpm's yourself...  likely that'll produce the errors you seek.
> > > Second, RH6.2(which I use currently) does have a "custom workstation"
> > option,
> > > and after that a "choose packages" option.  I haven't seen the 7.1
> > installer,
> > > but it likely has those.
> > > Asher Freese
> > >
> > > Daniel Hauck wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have installed a fresh installation of RedHat 7.1 (Seawolf).  I
> > installed
> > > > "everything" and have added nothing extra.  I have run the Ximian
> > installer
> > > > twice now in two different ways -- first remotely and second by
> > downloading
> > > > all the files from their web site.  In both cases the installer will
> > refuse
> > > > to install anything based on unresolved dependencies.
> > > >
> > > > This is a FRESH install.  Everything is stock.  This is really becoming
> > > > disappointing to me now.  There should be no more ideal installation
> > > > platform than the one I have selected and yet it doesn't work.
> > > >
> > > > Furthermore, there is a lack of flexibility in the installer.  Four
> > install
> > > > options?  What's that?  We have no idea what we are installing in our
> > > > machines?  This is rather Microsoftian don't you think?  "Trust us, we
> > know
> > > > what you want to install."
> > > >
> > > > The error messages are vague with no apparent way for me to check or
> > report
> > > > precise errors.
> > > >
> > > > So now I have a fresh system that Ximian says will install but does not.
> > I
> > > > cannot tweak anything so that I can overcome the problems and I cannot
> > > > report the problems accurately because the errors are vague.  What am I
> > to
> > > > do?
> > > >
> > > > Security is mostly a superstition. It does not exist in nature. - Helen
> > > > Keller
> > > > UNIX *is* user-friendly; it's just picky about its friends.
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > gnome-list mailing list
> > > > gnome-list gnome org
> > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-list
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > gnome-list mailing list
> > > gnome-list gnome org
> > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-list
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-list mailing list
> > gnome-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-list
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-list mailing list
> > gnome-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-list mailing list
> gnome-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-list

_______________________________________________
gnome-list mailing list
gnome-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-list

-- 
Joel Brissenden                 Acrylis, Inc.
http://www.whatiflinux.com      73 Princeton St.
tel: 1 978 251 1987 x235        N. Chelmsford, MA 01863
fax: 1 978 251 1989             USA
 

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]