Re: Evolution discussion

["David T. Bath" <bathd edipost auspost com au>]

> I was wondering about the design of evolution.  IMHO it is better to have
> separate programs handling the separate responsibilities of e-mail, addresses, and a
> calendar.  I would like to know why Evolution is instead following the Microsoft
> example of making a large complicated program that is supposed to do
> everything.
1. I think your points are valid
2. To some extent email/addressing/calendar often interact with the same
entities
	e.g.	email a person
		send something to them
		schedule something with them
	While this make monolithism an easy choice, I agree little program with
appropriate
	hooks to each other (or an alternate tool) is more elegant
-- 
David T. Bath bathd edipost auspost com au
+613 9204 8713 (W) 0418 316 634 (Mbl)