Re: Re[2]: gtkhtml

[Jose Romildo Malaquias <romildo urano iceb ufop br>]

On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 09:59:56AM -0400, Steven Kordik wrote:
> P.S.
> 	Does it annoy anyone else that the "reply-to" field on the
> @gnome.org mailing lists is NOT the list address, but instead the
> origional sender?  This causes most people to use the "reply to all"
> feature of their mailers, causing a poster to receive TWO copies of any
> replies to his post. (once to the list, and a second directly to himself)
>  Personally, I prefer a list that sets the reply-to field to be the
> address of the list, allowing replies to be sent only to the list (by
> default)  This is the behavior on every list I am on, EXCEPT the
> @gnome.org lists...  Anyway, just a pet peave of mine.

Good mail clients would have a command to reply to the list instead
of to the sender without relying on the "Reply To" field (which
should not be the list address, but the sender). For example, with
mutt you mention which lists you subscribe in the configuration file
and you have the choice of replying to the sender (R) or replying to the
list (L).

I did not look at your mail client program yet, but I think you should
consider adding this feature to it.

Romildo
-- 
Prof. José Romildo Malaquias <romildo@iceb.ufop.br>
Departamento de Computação
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto
Brasil