Re: Request: Test suite for EFS




Hello !

On Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 04:05:21PM -0600, bob@thestuff.net wrote:
> He's right. but .tar, not .tar.gz.
> It would solve everyone's problem.
[clip]

Maybe not .tar.gz nor .tar, but .zip ? Since the directory info is grouped
and not compressed, you get a *fast* virtual filesystem with automatic
compression (levels 0-9).

Suppressing/Adding streams to a .zip can be extremely efficient (references : 
I was used to Windows Commander and ZipFolders when I was using W$). 
Windows Commander was using the Info-Zip code (I don't know if it is still
the case, but it was darn fast on my machine more than two years ago).

Just my 2c.

Cu,
Damien.
 
> -- 
>         FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
>          To unsubscribe: mail gnome-list-request@gnome.org with 
>                        "unsubscribe" as the Subject.

-- 
* You don't want a DVD player : http://linuxtoday.com/stories/16556.html
-- 
Diederen Damien
diederen@swing.be
http://users.swing.be/diederen/



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]