Re: ANNOUCE: gTrouble - New project [summary]
- From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel Veillard w3 org>
- To: "David C. Mason" <dcm redhat com>
- Cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: ANNOUCE: gTrouble - New project [summary]
- Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 10:40:27 -0400
> If you like XML, you like SGML. XML is a subset of SGML. If you look
Maybe and no. XML forces more structure than SGML. I suggest to use
the XML format instead of the SGML one since:
- an SGML parser can parse XML, not the way around
- XML enforce more structure on the document, hence ease the
reusability
- XML tools are numerous, usaully small, while SGML requires a more
heavy environment
- Doc in XML can be directly displayed in IE5 and Mozilla, if one
provide a stylesheet. It's not the case for SGML
> at dtds for XML that are based on the equivalent for SGML (DocBook is
> one) you will see that they are practically the same except that the
> XML versions usually have less tags available.
I suggest we investigate moving from DocBook/SGML to DocBook/XML,
even Eve Maler the original author of DocBook has now switched to
the XML version. I would be surprized we use some of the SGML only features
and if not I can try to check with the DocBook authors for reintegration
of those.
Daniel
--
Daniel.Veillard@w3.org | W3C, INRIA Rhone-Alpes | Today's Bookmarks :
Tel: +33 476 615 257 | 655, avenue de l'Europe | Linux, WWW, rpmfind,
Fax: +33 476 615 207 | 38330 Montbonnot FRANCE | rpm2html, XML,
http://www.w3.org/People/W3Cpeople.html#Veillard | badminton, and Kaffe.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]