Re: gdm/xdm setup
- From: Govind Salinas <warder pcisys net>
- To: Roberto Zunino <zunino cli di unipi it>
- Cc: Ben FrantzDale <frantb rpi edu>, gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gdm/xdm setup
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 22:10:50 -0500
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999 16:57:04 Roberto Zunino wrote:
>
> On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Ben FrantzDale wrote:
>
> > thanks.... that's what I was looking for :-)
> >
> > One other oddity: I removed the redhat logo and turned the background
> > black, adding xflame -root to $prefix/etc/gdm/Init/Default. It seemed as
> > though xflame was running very strangely (slowly, glitchy) and a check of
> > top revealed two coppies of it running. killing one made it better.
> > I also tried Eterm -e top as part of $prefix/etc/gdm/Init/Default this lead
> > to two instances of top!
> > I got rid of the Eterm line and had this:
> > killall xflame
> > xflame -root &
> > the problem with an ugly xflame went away, so it appears as though
> > $prefix/etc/gdm/Init/Default is being run twice. is this intentional?
> >
> > also, if xflame doesn't have the ampersand on the end, the gdm logon screen
> > doesnt appear. with the ampersand you have to click the mouse before it
> > appears, then, of course, you have to kill xflame as root once you are loged
> > in.
> >
> > suggjestions?
> >
> > thanks,
> > Ben
>
> (assuming gdm2-beta)
>
> If you start something in Init, it must be non blocking: i.e. if the
> command doesn't return immediately (like xflame but unlike xv -root , for
> example) you must use the ampersand in order to run it in the background.
>
> Check that you have KillInitClients=1 in your $prefix/etc/gdm/gdm.conf in
> the [daemon] section: this option should kill what you start in Init
> so you don't have to kill it yourself.
>
> Hope this helps!
> Zun.
>
I have this line in my gdm.conf and I still get two versions of xflame.
However, I put
killall xflame
xflame -root &
in my Defaults file and I only endup running one at a time.
NB:I am assuming that one Default script is run and then the other. If
that is not the case and both processes run concurrently you could still
end up with two xflames.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]