Re: module viewer
- From: George <jirka 5z com>
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: module viewer
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 11:29:42 -0700
On Wed, Oct 27, 1999 at 11:30:33AM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> | The feel and behavior of GNOME apps is identical to the feel and behavior
> | of non-GNOME apps. They BOTH use the Gtk+ widgets underneath. And I doubt
> | a simple lsmod rmmod program would have any need to use libart (why would
> | you need a canvas for that???)
>
> When I referred to the canvas I was talking about general apps, not
> this one specifically. But other than that GNOME menus and GTK menus
> are not the same thing. This is also true for a great deal of other
> widgets.
Exactly my point. GTK+ is a general toolkit where there is almost no policy
specified. GNOME widgets follow more policy which can be specified in
configuration files.
There are a lot of little things that people can get used to that work in a
GNOME app but won't work in a GTK+ app. This is again the consistency part.
I for example can get used to accelerators on menus gettting saved and
reloaded automatically, or I can get used to a particular way I can set up
dialogs. (for example where they appear) ... I can also get used to dropping
files into file entries and it working correctly. Remember these are just a
couple of these things and there are many more, some of which WILL be
relevant to almost any app.
George
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
George Lebl <jirka@5z.com> http://www.5z.com/jirka/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following implements RSA in perl and is illegal to export from the US:
#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]