Re: GLIBC_2.1/RPM problem

[bratsche dfw net]

Is there any purpose in having both glibc 2.0 and 2.1 installed? glibc 2.0
built programs also run with 2.1, so I don't see any purpose in this. Try
rebuilding guile from SRPM.

Cody

On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, brady wrote:

> Is anyone else getting this too?  What the heck does this mean?  I get this with a bunch of newer RPMs.
> 
> [root@localhost new]# rpm -Uvh guile-1.3-4.i386.rpm
> failed dependencies:
>         libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by guile-1.3-4
>         libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by guile-1.3-4
>         libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by guile-1.3-4
>         libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by guile-1.3-4
>         libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by guile-1.3-4
>         libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by guile-1.3-4
>         libguile.so.2 is needed by libgtop-examples-0.99.2-1
>         libguile.so.2 is needed by gnome-games-0.99.8-3
> 
> I have glibc installed.  In fact I have both of them.  All the files listed above exist in my path so what's the problem?  I sure hope someone else is running into this also.
> 
> [root@localhost new]# rpm -q glibc
> glibc-2.0.7-29
> glibc-2.1-0.990204
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Brady
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "...the film is every bit as dauntingly abstract in its spasmodic hyperrealism..."
> - Howard Hampton describing the movie "The Blade"
> 
> 
> -- 
>         FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
>          To unsubscribe: mail gnome-list-request@gnome.org with 
>                        "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>