Re: GNOME on SuSE 6.0, a nightmare.
- From: Jan Gentsch <gentsch ifm uni-hamburg de>
- To: Karl Eichwalder <ke suse de>, gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME on SuSE 6.0, a nightmare.
- Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 12:20:15 +0100
You have given the answear yourself, use something like this (taken from
my spec-files):
export PATH=${PATH}:/opt/gnome/bin
export ACLOCAL_FLAGS="-I/opt/gnome/share/aclocal"
if [ ! -f configure ]; then
CPPFLAGS="-I/usr/X11R6/include" LDFLAGS="-L/usr/X11R6/lib" \
CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" ./autogen.sh --prefix=%prefix
else
CPPFLAGS="-I/usr/X11R6/include" LDFLAGS="-L/usr/X11R6/lib" \
CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" ./configure --prefix=%prefix
fi
Then configure will find libpng, libz and co and everything should work
fine.
Gnome 1.0 will be available from my site
http://ifmpc118.ifm.uni-hamburg.de/gnome.html and mirrors propably
tommorrow morning.
After that there will be a clean-up period where the remaining SuSE
specific problems
and adaptions will be worked on.
Jan
Karl Eichwalder wrote:
>
> Martin Hawlisch <hawlisch@roxi.rz.fh-mannheim.de> writes:
>
> | zlib caused a problem because SuSE installs the lib into
> | /usr/X11R6/lib, I don`t know why, and the config-stuff and Makefiles
> | couldn't find it because when linking -lz the Makefile and
> | configure-script didn't add -L/usr/X11R6/lib and zlib was not found.
>
> Unfortunately, this is for historical reasons; one figured out, normally
> there is no problem to configure and compile tar.gz files from
> ftp.gnome.org; I do my very best to spot difficulties and Miguel and
> friends are helpful to take care of it.
>
> Of course, if one of these GNOME packages requires a newer than new tool
> or toolkit, you've to install it. automake 1.4 e.g., is newer
> (1999-01-14) than the release date of SuSE Linux 6.0... not to mention
> gtk 1.2. If _evaluated_ these package will find there way into the SuSE
> distro -- but not sooner ;-) As you all know, I hope, SuSE Linux is
> little bit conservative (the keyword is: stability).
>
> | So my questions is: What is causing the black icon problem? Should I
> | try libpng 1.0.0 ??
>
> I don't know. All my testing was done with 1.0.1 and this works quite
> well. No problems with icons (I perform by tests in most cases with
> 16bpp).
>
> | Btw, I used CVS GNOME from yesterday.
>
> Okay, I've only tested the 1.0 (pre) serie.
>
> --
> Karl Eichwalder
>
> --
> FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
> To unsubscribe: mail gnome-list-request@gnome.org with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]