Re: imlib



On Sun, 1 Aug 1999, Marcus Brubaker wrote:

> Out of idle curiosity, why (and when, must have missed that thread) are we
> replacing imlib?  And just from the name, isn't libart under the GPL?

It's a thread started by Miguel de Icaza in gnome-devel-list in July.
Search the archive, he have great explanations why replacing imlib. Yes,
libart is under GNU LGPL license.

   -augusto



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]