Re: rpms
- From: bob kehs ksd org
- To: Mark Hankins <mhankins cs pdx edu>
- cc: cyberclay <cclay fastlane net>, gnome-list gnome org, recipient list not shown: ;
- Subject: Re: rpms
- Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 07:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
please post the spec.in files for inclusion into cvs... that would fix
many problems :)
note: the spec files are generated from the spec.in files. so if you want
to have your changes stick, you put them in the spec.in file.
thanks
bob
On Fri, 9 Apr 1999, Mark Hankins wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Apr 1999 bob@kehs.ksd.org wrote:
> > nope, you will have to roll your own...
> > rpm -ta whaterer.tar.gz
> >
> > for each file :(
> >
> > On Sun, 4 Apr 1999, cyberclay wrote:
> > > Hey,
> > > Where are the 1.0.5 rpms for i386?
>
> The .spec files that come with the tarballs (CVS snapshots too) don't always
> contain everything they need to build proper(IMO) RPMs. Sometimes they can
> be left overs from past released RPMs. Which I don't blame the anyone for,
> since the gnome developers' job is not to maintain them. I can post up some
> .spec files that I have hacked together if people want them, or if people
> would like, or if there is a place, I can put my srpms and i386 rpms on some
> ftp site.
>
> Mark Hankins
>
> BTW: So far I haven't gotten ALL of the gnome-* stuff made. I am still
> doing some in house testing first.
>
>
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]