Re: mc ongoing bug
- From: Mike McEwan <mike lotusland demon co uk>
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: mc ongoing bug
- Date: 03 Apr 1999 04:05:30 +0100
Ronald de Man <deman@win.tue.nl> writes:
> I experienced this today for the first time. I decided to make a backtrace,
> so recompiled gmc with options -g -O2. Now the bug was gone. My compiler
> is pgcc-1.1.1 and by default I compile with -O6. What compiler and
> compilation flags are you using?
I'm also using pgcc-1.1.1, however I have been using the default
CFLAGS provided in the gmc Makefile. I believe this is `-g -O2' (or
perhaps just `-g' with no optimisation) by default - no? The same
flags which do *not* give you the problem.
> I'm not saying that it must be a compiler bug. It might be a subtle bug
> in gmc that's only triggered by some compilers (for example an uninitialized
> variable, whose initial value will depend on the compiler used).
Well, I guess we're both pgcc-1.1.1 - wonder what others with the
problem are using?
> If you want this fixed, you should definitely try to provide the
> developers with a stacktrace of the coredump.
But I'm not getting a coredump??
--
Mike.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]