Re: mc ongoing bug



Ronald de Man <deman@win.tue.nl> writes:

> I experienced this today for the first time. I decided to make a backtrace,
> so recompiled gmc with options -g -O2. Now the bug was gone. My compiler
> is pgcc-1.1.1 and by default I compile with -O6. What compiler and
> compilation flags are you using?

  I'm also using pgcc-1.1.1, however I have been using the default
CFLAGS provided in the gmc Makefile. I believe this is `-g -O2' (or
perhaps just `-g' with no optimisation) by default - no? The same
flags which do *not* give you the problem.
 
> I'm not saying that it must be a compiler bug. It might be a subtle bug
> in gmc that's only triggered by some compilers (for example an uninitialized
> variable, whose initial value will depend on the compiler used).

  Well, I guess we're both pgcc-1.1.1 - wonder what others with the
problem are using?

> If you want this fixed, you should definitely try to provide the
> developers with a stacktrace of the coredump.

  But I'm not getting a coredump??
   
-- 
Mike.



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]