Re: "proprietary" vs. polluting (was Re: propriatary question)
- From: "Brandon S. Allbery" <allbery ece cmu edu>
- To: jrb redhat com
- Cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: "proprietary" vs. polluting (was Re: propriatary question)
- Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 15:48:34 -0500
In message <199904022047.PAA06585@aware-of-vacuity.labs.redhat.com>, jrb@redhat
.com writes:
+-----
| > (Although it's probably gone anyway, since it appears that parts of it now
| > require egcs and we have no intention of supporting egcs across all our
| > platforms in the near future. This isn't open to debate, nor to the
|
| Nothing in GNOME requires egcs (or gcc, for that matter) If something does,
+--->8
A recent (as in, earlier today) message pointed out that "build with egcs" is
the "official" fix for a problem in gnome-objc. I've a few other things that
need to be built with egcs on my home system -- and no interest in finding
out if the same is true on my work Solaris box.
| Also, the menu heirarchies were moved from ${PREFIX}/share/apps to
| ${PREFIX}/share/gnome/apps to prevent conflict with KDE. It's a matter of
| being polite and clean, not proprietary.
+--->8
That was the point I was after.
--
brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][japh] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu
electrical and computer engineering KF8NH
carnegie mellon university ["God, root, what is difference?" -Pitr]
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]