Re: static vs shared (was: Re: Win vs. UNIX usability )
- From: Liss Svanberg <lisss ydab se>
- To: "'Alan Shutko'" <ats acm org>
- Cc: "Gnome MAIN Mailing list (E-mail)" <gnome-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: static vs shared (was: Re: Win vs. UNIX usability )
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 23:14:05 +0200
Somewhere in a previous letter, Alan Shutko [ats@acm.org] wrote:
> Well, I at least didn't think you had. I'm just trying to understand
> what you think is a problem. I can't think of any applications that
> include their own shared libraries. At first, I thought you might
> have been espousing a JWZ-like attitude that shared-libraries are
> always bad. In general, I've found Unix apps to be very good about
> not generating unnecessary shared libraries.
Well, I'm just afraid of them. :)
(I have had very bad experience of *them* from windows. Actually, I have had very bad experience of windows. :(
mvh
// Liss
liss@ydab.se
Ps. Please define "JWZ-like attitude"
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]