Re: static vs shared (was: Re: Win vs. UNIX usability )
- From: Alan Shutko <ats acm org>
- To: Liss Svanberg <lisss ydab se>
- Cc: "Gnome MAIN Mailing list (E-mail)" <gnome-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: static vs shared (was: Re: Win vs. UNIX usability )
- Date: 30 Sep 1998 16:19:38 -0500
>>>>> "L" == Liss Svanberg <lisss@ydab.se> writes:
L> Perhaps I should end this letter, saying that I never intended to
L> insult anyone. I really hope that it never sounded as if I said
L> that the Gnome developers did someting stupid.
Well, I at least didn't think you had. I'm just trying to understand
what you think is a problem. I can't think of any applications that
include their own shared libraries. At first, I thought you might
have been espousing a JWZ-like attitude that shared-libraries are
always bad. In general, I've found Unix apps to be very good about
not generating unnecessary shared libraries.
--
Alan Shutko <ats@acm.org> - By consent of the corrupted
Don't blame me, I'm from Uranus.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]