Re: word processor document format: what parts?
- From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel nuclecu unam mx>
- To: rosalia cygnus com
- CC: tlewis mindspring net, rosalia cygnus com, patrick narkinsky ml org, gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: word processor document format: what parts?
- Date: Sat, 19 Sep 1998 18:50:09 -0500
> I understand your goal, and respect it somewhat. As Miguel did with
> gnumeric, you want to get that piece of office s/w out there rather
> than being cool and innovative (as some people are with spreadsheets
> like siag).
I think you got this wrong.
I want Gnumeric to be an Excel replacement, but that hardly makes it a
non-innovative ground. The problem with every other free spreadsheet
out there is that the code is definetly not good enough to be the
foundation for an Excel-like application.
They might be perfect for modelling new ideas with a horrible GUI, but
they are definetly not the foundation for the future and the code is
definetly far from being nice/maintainable as Gnumeric is.
So, now that we have an Excel-like clone, we can work on modelling
new, exciting and innovative features on top of a solid, nice and
extensible framework ;-).
Miguel.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]