Re: Word Processors

[John R Sheets <dusk smsi-roman com>]

Thanks, Daniel.  That completely answers my question (and with
hyperlink references, not too shabby!).  (c:  I'll let you know
how it goes if I do decide to use gnome-xml.

John


Daniel Veillard wrote:
> 
>   Nearly complete implementation of the XML 1.0 specification [1].
> Support new and old namespace [2] proposals. Is in use for the RPM metadata
> project [3] for a couple of months without problems (handle about 150 MBytes
> of XML/RDF files everyday).
>   Things to improve are:
>     - XML entity support
>     - Language encoding
>     - APIs, there is currently a tree interface, and a basic
>       SAX [4] like interface to be completed
>     - Add DOM interfaces [5]
>     - etc ...
> 
> Stability of the code should be Ok. Stability of the interfaces is not
> guarantee however (but more adding than changes/removals).
>   Work in progress, but usable and in use already,
> 
> Daniel
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xml-names
> [3] http://rufus.w3.org/linux/rpm2html/mirroring.html
> [4] http://www.microstar.com/XML/SAX/
> [5] http://www.w3.org/DOM/