Re: gnome developer docs - not sgml

["Andrew S. Townley" <atownley informix com>]

I have also done this.  I had to hand-hack nearly every libtool script so it  
could find the ltmain.sh script.  That was the only problem related to tools  
that I had.

ast

>Begin forwarded message:
>
>Resent-Date: 3 Nov 1998 14:50:24 -0000
>Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
>MBOX-Line: From gnome-list-request@gnome.org  Tue Nov  3 09:50:22 1998
>Subject: Re: gnome developer docs - not sgml
>To: luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr
>Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1998 09:39:55 -0500 (EST)
>Cc: miguel@nuclecu.unam.mx, Newcombe@mordor.clayton.edu, gnome-list@gnome.org
>Reply-To: jgarzik@pobox.com
>In-Reply-To: <19981103151804.D626@maxime.u-strasbg.fr> from  
"luther@maxime.u-strasbg.fr" at Nov 3, 98 03:18:04 pm
>From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
>Resent-From: gnome-list@gnome.org
>X-Mailing-List: <gnome-list@gnome.org> archive/latest/1319
>X-Loop: gnome-list@gnome.org
>X-just-a-test: testing
>Resent-Sender: gnome-list-request@gnome.org
>X-URL: http://www.gnome.org
>
>luther@maxime.u-strasbg.fr wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 02, 1998 at 05:18:32PM -0600, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
>> > > The next, and hardest part is finding all the gnu stuff which everyone
>> > > else uses, such as autogen/autoconf, m4, and all of the libraries which
>> > > comes with most Linux distributions (ie libtiff, libjpeg...)
>
>> > Autoconf/Automake/LIbtool are only required if you use the CVS source
>> > code.  If you use the released tarballs you dont need those.
>
>> False, the libtool things were broken in gnome-libs 0.30 and 0.30.1 without GNU
>> libtool ...
>
>heh, I just built 0.30.1 on Solaris w/o auto* and libtool.
>
>	Jeff
>
>
>
>
>--
>         To unsubscribe: mail gnome-list-request@gnome.org with
>                       "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>