Re: gnome developer docs - not sgml
- From: luther maxime u-strasbg fr
- To: Havoc Pennington <rhpennin midway uchicago edu>, luther dpt-info u-strasbg fr
- Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik pobox com>, Dan Newcombe <Newcombe mordor clayton edu>, gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gnome developer docs - not sgml
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1998 14:48:54 +0100
On Mon, Nov 02, 1998 at 12:17:32PM -0600, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Nov 1998 luther@maxime.u-strasbg.fr wrote:
> >
> > i have to report, that also i gave up trying to compile gnome-libs on solaris
> > 2.6. In the process of trying to make it work, i had to compile so much gnu
> > stuff that other things got broken.
>
> How is the GNU stuff going to break other things?
>
don't know, but i think i just have to recompile all the stuff, to make sure it
use the shared library it was supposed to use ...
> > it would be nice to have a list of all
> > other packages that gnome-libs needs for compiling.
> >
>
> This should be on www.gnome.org or in the FAQ, I think.
>
yes but it is not ...
> > ok too bad for me then :(, i suppose this mean it is no more a goal for gnome
> > to compile on any major UNIX plateform ?)
> >
>
> It does compile and compilation is a goal. It just requires a bunch of
> libraries.
>
> We could duplicate the code in those libraries, and ship that with Gnome,
> but it would just cause bloat and a maintenance nightmare. Better to
> install the libraries.
>
i never asked to include all the stuff that are in external library into gnome,
not only would it be a nightmare, but it would be the Wrong Thing to do.
but then many thing could be handled by judicious #ifdefs and even just
checking them in the autoconf/automake thing would be nice than the current
situation.
> There is a difference between non-portable and hard to compile. (many
> people never get it to compile on Linux.) We can't help it if Solaris has
> a crappy packaging system and doesn't ship with as much software as Linux
> or FreeBSD. Gnome will run on Solaris, but you have to deal with its
> weaknesses.
>
like said, no problem with me, just tell me in advance what packages i do need,
and i will install them (gnu stuff will compile without major problem). And i
think this problems are the same than the one people encouter when compiling
under some not so standard Linux systems.
Friendly,
Sven LUTHER
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]