Re: ORBit and Glib don't agree about (G_)HAVE_GINT64
- From: Raja R Harinath <harinath cs umn edu>
- To: "Brandon S. Allbery" <allbery ece cmu edu>
- Cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: ORBit and Glib don't agree about (G_)HAVE_GINT64
- Date: 02 Nov 1998 12:20:11 -600
"Brandon S. Allbery" <allbery@ece.cmu.edu> writes:
> As of last night, ORBit compile on both my RH50 and Solaris 2.5.1 systems is
> failing with complaints about HAVE_GINT64 not being defined by Glib followed
> by various undefined type errors which obviously follow from it.
>
> On both hosts (which "cvs update" daily) there is indeed no HAVE_GINT64... but
> both have G_HAVE_GINT64 defined.
>
> Obviously either ORBit or Glib is out of step. (Oh, both hosts have ORBit
> checked out -rFOR_PANEL, unless someone managed to confuse CVS such that it
> lost the "sticky" tag on both hosts.) Could someone check this, please?
Hmm... I thought that FOR_PANEL was advertised to work only with
released GLIB versions. If you're using a "stable" version, I don't
think it is a stretch to require that all its dependencies be "stable"
too.
Anyway, change the
#ifdef HAVE_GINT64
to
#ifdef G_HAVE_GINT64
in ORBit/src/orb/basic_types.h and ORBit/libIDL/libIDL.h. This is what
happened in the ORBit trunk.
- Hari
--
Raja R Harinath ------------------------------ harinath@cs.umn.edu
"When all else fails, read the instructions." -- Cahn's Axiom
"Our policy is, when in doubt, do the right thing." -- Roy L Ash
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]