Re: XML and GNOME community
- From: Mark Andrew Hulme-Jones <ceemahj cee hw ac uk>
- To: Christopher Blizzard <blizzard appliedtheory com>
- cc: Daniel Veillard w3 org, tromey cygnus com, Stephanos Piperoglou <sp249 cam ac uk>, gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: XML and GNOME community
- Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 16:55:10 +0100 (BST)
On Fri, 5 Jun 1998, Christopher Blizzard wrote:
> Daniel.Veillard@w3.org wrote:
>
> >
> > I have however a big question, does Gnome project accept contributions
> > which are not under the GPL/LGPL license ? Most of my code may be
> > covered by the W3C Copyright and I really want to know before starting
> > if such code can be incorporated in Gnome ! Could one of the member of
> > the Gnome Team have a look at the W3C Copyright and give me some feedback
> > (http://www.w3.org/Copyright.html), thanks.
> >
>
> The license is pretty much a BSD license from what I can tell. I think
> then that if an XML parser is created as a library then it can be used
> in gnome. Most of the applications in Gnome are GPL and the libraries
> are LGPL.
>
> I'm pretty sure that you can create GPL applications and the underlying
> libraries don't have to be GPL/LGPL. I derive this conclusion mostly
> through the fact that other programs exist that already do this, rpm
> being one of them. It uses berkley db which is BSD licensed.
>
> Hmm...on my RedHat 5.0 system /usr/lib/libdb.so is actually part of
> glibc. Does that mean that the berkley db isn't used anymore? That
> means that I could be pretty full of it. Stick a fork in me. :)
I'm pretty sure I read someplace that Berkely DB is included as part of
glibc, and hence RH5
Mark
>
>
> --Chris
>
> --
>
> ------------
> Christopher Blizzard
> AppliedTheory Communications, Inc.
> http://odin.appliedtheory.com/
> blizzard@appliedtheory.com
> ------------
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail gnome-list-request@gnome.org with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]