Re: ORB?
- From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel nuclecu unam mx>
- To: Benedikt Heinen infrasys ascom ch
- CC: philipd parallax co uk, gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: ORB?
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 12:02:09 -0600
> > MICO looks pretty simple and easy to understand. Probably doing this
> > hack for MICO is also worth doing.
>
> Hmm, but if I understand correctly, those wrappers won't free you from having
> to have a c++ library and headers around, since those wrappers will use
> libmico, right?
This is correct. At least for now, we would use a C++ runtime.
> If that is the case, why even bother to do those wrappers? Since you're
> required to have a c++ library/includes around, you'll most likely also have
> a c++ compiler around, why not use that directly? Or am I wrong here?
Oh, because I dont like C++ much and would like to keep using plain C
for my code (I dont mind if the stubs are compiled with C++), as in
the future we might implement a C ORB.
Miguel.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]