Re: "consistent look and feel" && "WM independent"??
- From: "Michael J. Mitchell" <mitch redback com au>
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: "consistent look and feel" && "WM independent"??
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 02:54:53 +1100
Russell Nelson wrote:
> Tom Tromey writes:
> > Raster> So am I. You CANNOT make a desktop and not include a wm. It is
> > Raster> the ONLY program that by X standards is defined to run ALL the
> > Raster> TIME.
> > That's true, but Gnome != X. Gnome will require the "GOA" at least.
> > (IMHO) users will be encouraged to run the session manager as well.
> This is confusing. Are you saying that Gnome isn't going to require X?
> X requires a WM; therefore if Gnome requires X, then Gnome requires a WM.
> -russ <email@example.com> http://www.crynwr.com/~nelson
> Crynwr Software supports freed software | PGPok | Freedom is the primary
> 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | cause of Peace, Love,
> Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | Truth and Justice.
> To unsubscribe: mail firstname.lastname@example.org with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
Actually I don't think X does "require" a window manager. For example
try using the failsafe login on your X-terminal (or if xdm is properly
set up on your box). It usually defaults to an xterm. No WM.
I think the thread may refer to session management as well as window
management. These are not necessarily (in fact at present almost never)
done by the same program. Have a look at the man page for xsm.
And also a look at the hardcopy docs for X11 atoms which lists some of
those which are specific to session management.
] [Thread Prev