Re: Harmony + GNOME (Was: Re: C++)
- From: robert havoc pennington <rhpennin midway uchicago edu>
- To: Joel Dillon <emily cornholio new ox ac uk>
- cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Harmony + GNOME (Was: Re: C++)
- Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 00:50:25 -0500 (CDT)
On Wed, 22 Apr 1998, Joel Dillon wrote:
>
> Harmony isn't a wrapper. It's what you'd call a random X-only toolkit;
> it's main aim is to make KDE a real GPL environment (currently RMS says
> that its use of Qt violates the GPL). But it would also be nice if you
Ah, I lost track of exactly what toolkit you were talking about.
I think if Harmony allows both KDE and Gnome apps, then it is in essence a
cross-platform toolkit (though admittedly, both platforms are X-based). It
would have to do different things depending on the environment. It's not
clear *how* different, and clearly it will be less difficult than
supporting both X and Win32 like Qt; but IMO if you want to support both
KDE and Gnome you should think cross-platform, via either the wrapper or
emulation routes.
> question here. But since noone's radically objected I guess we'll go ahead
> with putting in gtk compatibility and see what people say when we have
> more working.
>
Hey, people haven't had much time. :) I doubt anyone will object to Gtk
compatibility. Making apps work with both KDE and Gnome is an admirable
goal. I'd just suggest having them native-like in both environments,
rather than some kind of weird hybrid.
Havoc Pennington
http://pobox.com/~hp
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]