Re: C++
- From: Joel Dillon <emily cornholio new ox ac uk>
- To: Derek Simkowiak <dereks animal blarg net>
- cc: Preston Brown <pbrown econ yale edu>, Miguel de Icaza <miguel nuclecu unam mx>, gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: C++
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998 14:55:24 +0100 (BST)
I agree that Objective-C is both more elegant and more powerful. I use
C++ for two reasons - firstly I don't have the time to learn a new
language at the moment and secondly C++ is simply more widely used than
Objective-C. It's better on your CV and there are more C++ programmers
out there.
On Thu, 9 Apr 1998, Derek Simkowiak wrote:
> > The thing that C cannot duplicate that C++ has, as well as smalltalk,
> > Objective-C, and other OO languages, is the simplicity and elegance of
> > object oriented design, particularly inheritance.
>
> The elegence is the really the core of it, I believe. My question
> is, why have people been using C++ instead of Objective-C?
>
> Derek
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail gnome-list-request@gnome.org with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]