Re: Hrm. Now I know why this list is dead
- From: Martin Konold <konold alpha tat physik uni-tuebingen de>
- To: Jonas Luster <jonas nethammer qad org>
- cc: gnome-kde-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Hrm. Now I know why this list is dead
- Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 20:12:21 +0200 (CEST)
On 21 May 1999, Jonas Luster wrote:
> > Nonsense. SuSE includes GNOME for a long time and clearly says so
> > in their advertising. The top priority in their package compilation
> > are the demands of their customers. The people making big press
> Is that te reason, why Gnome is broken in the newest Release?
No, they tried their best. But GNOME 1.0 was simply to broken. They even
advertized GNOME as beeing a stable product. IMHO this was just plain
wrong from a technical point of view.
> > releases about their boycotting a free software project are seated
> > somewhere else.
> When SuSE started to support KDE ist was _not_ free all in all.
KDE was free since the beginning (I was my fault that KDE chose (L)GPL)
// Martin Konold, Herrenbergerstr. 14, 72070 Tuebingen, Germany //
// Email: firstname.lastname@example.org //
Anybody who's comfortable using KDE should use it. Anyone who wants to
tell other people what they should be using can go to work for Microsoft.
KDE not only OpenSource[TM] but OpenMinded[TM].
KDE: A stable GUI for a reliable OS.
] [Thread Prev